OSTEOSTRONG
OSTEOSTRONG LAWSUIT OVERVIEW: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
OsteoStrong has attracted attention as a forward-thinking wellness brand offering a unique approach to musculoskeletal health through its patented osteogenic loading technology. Its innovative model has gained traction with a broad customer base and an expanding franchise network. Like many fast-growing franchises, OsteoStrong has faced legal challenges—primarily involving questions around franchisee expectations, disclosures, and marketing practices. These disputes, while notable, are not uncommon in the franchising space and often reflect the growing pains of scaling a disruptive concept in the wellness industry.
IS OSTEOSTRONG SAFE AND LEGITIMATE?
While lawsuits may raise questions, it’s important to note that legal action is common among growing franchise systems. Many OsteoStrong locations continue to operate with satisfied clients and no reported legal issues. The brand remains active, with thousands of users reporting improved strength and bone density.
KEY OSTEOSTRONG LAWSUITS
Richter et al. v. OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC
Filed: 2018, U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico (Case No. 1:18‑cv‑01184)
Original claim: OsteoStrong alleged that prospective franchisees (Richter, Nixon, JDAP Inc., DancingBones LLC) misappropriated trade secrets, breached contract, competed unfairly via trademark violations, and launched a competing clinic using OsteoStrong confidential materials.
Outcome: Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted—OsteoStrong’s claims (trade-secrets, contract, unfair competition, trademark infringement) were dismissed. Other motions (e.g. amendment, attorney fees) also denied. Justia Law+11Justia Law+11Law Street Media+11
Public link: Justia docket entry with summary judgment decision (doc. 172) Justia Law+1Justia Dockets & Filings+1
Simpson et al. v. OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC
Filed: Mid‑2019, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas (Case No. 4:19‑cv‑2334)
Original claim: Franchisees (Simpson entities) alleged fraud and misrepresentation—OsteoStrong omitted prior bankruptcies/executive history and failed to deliver promised training in the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
Outcome: Partial summary judgment granted in OsteoStrong’s favor: release agreements signed by franchisee owners bound both individuals and corporate entities, barring most claims. Only negligent misrepresentation survived. Justia Dockets & Filings+2GovInfo+2Justia Law+2GovInfo+8JD Supra+8GovInfo+8
Public link: JDSupra commentary summarizing the ruling; govinfo docket confirms case context. JD Supra+1GovInfo+1
Baird et al. v. OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC
Filed: October 2020, Eastern District of California; later transferred to Southern District of Texas (Case No. 4:22‑cv‑00843)
Original claim: Group of franchisees claimed OsteoStrong omitted lawsuits and bankruptcies from its FDD, misrepresented patent ownership and health-related marketing claims (e.g. reversal of osteoporosis/type 2 diabetes), and misrepresented affiliations (Tony Robbins). Causes include fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, FTC Act and UCL violations, false patent marking, plus requests for declaratory and injunctive relief.
Outcome: Preliminary injunction denied—court found no proof of imminent irreparable harm; case remains ongoing in federal court. Supreme Court of Ohio+11GovInfo+11Justia Dockets & Filings+11Law Street Media+1Buchalter+1
Public link: Docket and legal commentary (govinfo, Law Street Media, Buchalter article). Law Street Media
.
OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC v. Gary Andrew Rhodes
Filed: February 11, 2020, Southern District of Texas (Case No. 4:20‑cv‑00465)
Original claim: OsteoStrong sued a former franchisee, Gary Andrew Rhodes, alleging breach of contract and unfair competition/trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1125.
Outcome: Only complaint filed publicly; no recorded judgment or disposition available in free public databases.Justia Law+3Justia Dockets & Filings+3CourtListener+3
Public link: Justia docket “OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC v. Rhodes.” Justia Law+7Justia Dockets & Filings+7CourtListener+7
Derek K. Albrecht v. OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC et al.
Filed: April 17, 2020, Central District of California (Case No. 5:20‑cv‑00826)
Original claim: Albrecht (and related parties) brought a breach-of-contract claim against OsteoStrong (and individual defendants), originally filed in state court then removed to federal court.
Outcome: The case was stayed and scheduled for settlement conference; no final outcome publicly available. Justia Law+11Justia Dockets & Filings+11GovInfo+11
Public link: Justia docket for Albrecht v. OsteoStrong Franchising LLC et al. Law Street Media+4Justia Dockets & Filings+4Buchalter+4
Oliveri v. OsteoStrong (Beatrice Oliveri)
Filed: 2018 in Lake County Court, Ohio; appealed to Ohio Eleventh District (2021‑Ohio‑1694)
Original claim: Beatrice Oliveri sued for negligence, improper instruction/supervision, and failure to warn after suffering a thoracic compression fracture during an OsteoStrong session.
Outcome: Trial court granted summary judgment in favor of OsteoStrong based on waiver and assumption-of-risk. On appeal (May 2021), the appellate court reversed and remanded, finding genuine factual issues about waiver clarity and inherent danger of the activity. GovInfo+4Supreme Court of Ohio+4JD Supra+4GovInfo
Public link: Published appellate opinion available through Ohio Supreme Court site. Supreme Court of Ohio
STAY INFORMED
Overall, OsteoStrong represents a bold entry into the performance and longevity space, pushing the boundaries of traditional health and wellness offerings. While its legal history highlights areas for continued improvement in franchise communication and risk management, it also reflects the brand’s willingness to defend its intellectual property and evolve under scrutiny. For health-conscious individuals seeking a non-pharmaceutical path to stronger bones and better stability, OsteoStrong remains a compelling and increasingly recognized option.
Whether you're a potential client, current franchisee, or simply curious, understanding the legal history of OsteoStrong can help you make an informed decision. This page will be updated regularly as new information becomes available.
Julie Gonzalez
The staff is kind friendly and helpful. Best of all, my bone health has improved
SUCCESS STORIES FROM OUR MEMBERS
Yolanda Romero
OsteoStrong is a great place to go to keep your bones strong! The staff is friendly and very knowledgeable. I have an injury on my knee and will be getting surgery so I am limited as to what I can do. I’ve been going to OsteoStrong to keep myself in shape and my knee as strong as possible. I highly recommend OsteoStrong to everyone.
Barbara Kingston
Great staff. Building muscle and bone strength is exciting. Looking forward to great year at Osteo Strong